Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mees Rottgering vs Kristjan Tamm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rottgering vs Tamm analysis and find out who is favored!
Mees Rottgering vs Kristjan Tamm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rottgering has won 48.98% of points on his second serve, while Tamm has won 45.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rottgering, in recent form, has won 56.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tamm has won 46.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.47% and 30.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rottgering has saved 64.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tamm has saved 65.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rottgering has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 16/ 12), with Tamm winning 45.83% (W/L 11/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rottgering has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5). Tamm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 94/ 72), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 11/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Rottgering has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/ 12), where as Tamm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rottgering winning 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Rottgering winning 1 and Tamm winning 0. The last match between Rottgering and Tamm was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 23-02-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Mees Rottgering getting the victory 3-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rottgering and Tamm have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rottgering winning 0 times and Tamm 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rottgering winning 0, and Tamm 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rottgering has played against opponents with an average rank of 56.21 while Tamm has played against players with an average rank of 168.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rottgering has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tamm has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rottgering has converted 51.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tamm has converted 38.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rottgering 1 - 0 Tamm
899
Rank
887
High
16
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
827
Rank
625
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
57% (17-13)
Career Total W/L
51% (164-156)
55% (6-5)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rottgering VS Tamm H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Mees Rottgering | Kristjan Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 0 |
| Games Won | 3 | 0 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:11:0 | 0:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 100% (4/4) | 64% (9/14) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 100% (4/4) | 33% (3/9) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 71% (10/14) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Rottgering VS Tamm H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-0 ret. |
Stats 
Mees Rottgering
Player
Kristjan Tamm
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mees Rottgering | Kristjan Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (6/5) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (13/12) | 45% (19/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (122/115) | 49% (195/206) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 44% (8/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 104 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:49 | 1:49:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 97 | 199.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (476/798) | 63% (835/1329) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (319/476) | 70% (581/835) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (154/322) | 45% (224/494) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (36/76) | 39% (42/108) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (293/734) | 37% (458/1253) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 44% (8/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (5/10) | 47% (8/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 10% (10/1) |
Mees Rottgering Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Mees Rottgering
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Unknown Player
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Mees Rottgering
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Mees Rottgering
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
19
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
57 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
10 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(7) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Mees Rottgering
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
David Perez Sanz
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Mees Rottgering
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Patrick Zahraj
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Kristjan Tamm
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
55%
(
65 of
118)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
43%
(
23 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
50 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kristjan Tamm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Kristjan Tamm
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corban Crowther
Player
Kristjan Tamm
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kristjan Tamm
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Corban Crowther
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Egor Agafonov
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Kristjan Tamm
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Ye Hongyu
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tauheed Browning
Player
Kristjan Tamm
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Kristjan Tamm
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Rottgering Vs Tamm Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
